Current:Home > InvestSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -FutureFinance
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 22:12:59
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (46656)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Do ab stimulators work? Here's what you need to know about these EMS devices.
- Ariana Grande Addresses Assumptions About Her Life After Challenging Year
- The Most-Shopped Celeb Picks in 2023— Shay Mitchell, Oprah Winfrey, Kendall Jenner, Sofia Richie & More
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Pierce Brosnan faces charges after allegedly walking in Yellowstone's thermal areas
- As new minimum wages are ushered in, companies fight back with fees and layoffs
- Mikaela Shiffrin closes out 2023 with a huge victory for 93rd career win
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's Romance Gets the Ultimate Stamp of Approval From His Chiefs Family
Ranking
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- 2023 in science: AI, the hottest year on record, and galactic controversy
- NYC, long a sanctuary city, will restrict buses carrying migrants from Texas
- These twins are taking steps for foster kids − big steps. They're walking across America.
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- 20 fillings, 4 root canals, 8 crowns in one visit add up to lawsuit for Minnesota dentist
- World population up 75 million this year, topping 8 billion by Jan. 1
- Billions of pounds of microplastics are entering the oceans every year. Researchers are trying to understand their impact.
Recommendation
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Jalen Milroe said Alabama's ex-offensive coordinator told him he shouldn't play quarterback
These struggling stocks could have a comeback in 2024
Alabama aims to get medical marijuana program started in 2024
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Texas police release new footage in murder investigation of pregnant woman, boyfriend
Barack Obama picks his favorite movies of the year: 'The Holdovers,' 'Oppenheimer,' others
How recent ‘swatting’ calls targeting officials may prompt heavier penalties for hoax police calls